{"id":673,"date":"2011-10-12T04:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-10-12T08:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dev.pirg-test.com\/georgia\/edfund\/resources\/tifreport-7\/"},"modified":"2022-08-16T13:54:38","modified_gmt":"2022-08-16T17:54:38","slug":"tax-increment-financing","status":"publish","type":"resource","link":"https:\/\/dev.pirg-test.com\/georgia\/edfund\/resources\/tax-increment-financing\/","title":{"rendered":"Tax-Increment Financing"},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-noindex":false,"_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-nofollow":false,"_yoast_wpseo_opengraph-title":"","_yoast_wpseo_opengraph-description":"","_yoast_wpseo_twitter-title":"","_yoast_wpseo_twitter-description":""},"campaign_tax":[],"display_option":[],"issue_tax":[],"resource_type":[64],"region_tax":[],"state":[13,2],"topic_tax":[],"class_list":["post-673","resource","type-resource","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":{"details":{"helper_taxonomies":{"topics":false,"collection":false,"press_type":false,"person_type":false,"resource_type":64,"event_type":false,"campaigns":false,"department":false,"level":false,"states":[2,13],"act_option":false,"display_option":false,"primary":{"topic":null}},"subtitle":"The Need for Increased Transparency and Accountability in Local Economic Development Subsidie","excerpt":"Local and state governments use various tools to encourage\u00a0 development in economically challenged areas. Tax-increment financing (TIF) has been a leading tool used for this purpose. TIF allows cities and towns to borrow against an area\u2019s future tax revenues in order to invest in immediate projects or encourage present development. When used properly, TIF can promote enduring growth and stronger communities.\u00a0 When used improperly, however, TIF can waste taxpayer resources or channel money to politically favored special interests.\nTo protect the public interest, governments should impose strong safeguards that ensure that TIF projects are implemented through a transparent, accountable process with clear and compelling goals.\nGovernments must use care in choosing when to use tax-increment financing. The public can benefit from subsidies that bring lasting economic development to declining or stagnant areas. However, tax-increment financing can be wasted on projects that:\nFail to achieve public goals. \u00a0By definition, TIF diverts money from schools, parks, and other important services. TIF projects certainly won\u2019t be justifiable, however, if they are used to support projects that fail to bring the hoped-for investment or harm the community in other ways.\nEnrich special interests at the public\u2019s expense. Poorly designed TIF programs can give government officials a tool to lavish subsidies on favored or well-connected developers \u2013 regardless of the project\u2019s public benefits.\n\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Encourage development in areas where it is least needed. TIF is intended to spur redevelopment of areas in difficult economic straits; but the tool has also been used to fuel development of previously undeveloped areas. Fort Worth, Texas, for example, used TIF financing to lure the big box sporting goods chain Cabela\u2019s to a tract of prime, newly developed land that was declared \u201cblighted\u201d due to the presence of a stream and lake on the property.\nThe process of awarding tax-increment financing often takes place without sufficient public awareness and input \u2013 creating the opportunity for favoritism and corruption.\u00a0\n\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 TIF often lacks transparency:\u00a0 The public often lacks the tools to evaluate whether a particular TIF project makes sense. In some states, TIF budgets are not published for public review.\u00a0 In addition, not all states require the completion and publication of growth forecasts that would enable the public to evaluate the costs and benefits of TIF subsidies.\n\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 TIF often lacks accountability:\u00a0 TIF is undertaken in the hope of generating specific benefits\u2014increased employment, land value, and tax revenue among them.\u00a0 Many TIF laws do not, however, require follow up reporting that would enable the public to determine if the goals of the project were realized.\n\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 TIF can create \u201cslush funds\u201d that lack public oversight and accountability: In some jurisdictions, TIF revenue can be spent at the discretion of mayors or other public officials. Chicago\u2019s TIF funds have traditionally been disbursed through a separate budget overseen by the mayor, and not even shared in full with the city council. Funds may be allocated to political allies or pet projects \u2013 or may continue to be used for projects inside a TIF district long after the project originally intended to receive the TIF funds was completed.\nTo prevent these problems, states and municipalities should adopt strong rules governing the use of TIF districts and similar development subsidies.\u00a0\u00a0 In short, rules should ensure that TIFs are targeted, transparent, accountable, and democratically governed.\n\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0TIF districts must be targeted and temporary.\u00a0 TIFs should only be used in service of a specific development strategy, and only in cases where evidence shows that they are likely to succeed. TIFs should not become an all-purpose tool for woo developers. They should only be targeted toward areas in special need of development, for projects that are unlikely to occur without public intervention, and with a defined time limit at which point the property\u2019s tax revenue will once again be used for general public purposes.\n\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Subsidy recipients must be held accountable for meeting goals.\u00a0 TIF agreements should include measurable targets for success, and regular performance reviews should measure progress towards those benchmarks. Where possible, municipalities should retain the ability to demand return of some or all of the money used to subsidize private investors in the event that development promises are not fulfilled.\n\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Information on TIF must be transparent.\u00a0 Because TIF has long-term implications for a jurisdiction\u2019s finances and ability to provide public services, the decision to create a TIF district should come with the highest level of transparency and public participation. In addition, jurisdictions should supply detailed, ongoing information about the finances and performance of TIF projects via the Internet, following \u201cTransparency 2.0\u201d standards of budget and spending disclosure. (See page xx.)\n\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Citizens must have the tools to evaluate the benefits and trade-offs of TIF. Governments should account for the costs of TIF districts as part of a jurisdiction\u2019s overall budget \u2013 enabling the public and decision-makers to evaluate the trade-offs involved in tax-increment financing and the impacts on other public services.","featured_image":"","caption_override":"","updated_on":null,"sidebar_action":null,"related_event":null,"hide_hero_image":false,"location":"","external_link":{"publication_name":"","url":""},"file":null,"sidebar_action_query_string":""},"helper_people_group":{"title":"Authors","entities":null},"helper_downloads":{"title":"Downloads","files":[{"file":100000000020096,"title":"Tax-Increment-Financing-vGA"}]},"page_layout":[{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":"","component_wysiwyg":{"content":"\n
Tax-Increment Financing<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Local and state governments use various tools to encourage\u00a0 development in economically challenged areas. Tax-increment financing (TIF) has been a leading tool used for this purpose. TIF allows cities and towns to borrow against an area\u2019s future tax revenues in order to invest in immediate projects or encourage present development. When used properly, TIF can promote enduring growth and stronger communities.\u00a0 When used improperly, however, TIF can waste taxpayer resources or channel money to politically favored special interests. To protect the public interest, governments should impose strong safeguards that ensure that TIF projects are implemented through a transparent, accountable process with clear and compelling goals. Governments must use care in choosing when to use tax-increment financing. The public can benefit from subsidies that bring lasting economic development to declining or stagnant areas. However, tax-increment financing can be wasted on projects that: Fail to achieve public goals. \u00a0By definition, TIF diverts money from schools, parks, and other important services. TIF projects certainly won\u2019t be justifiable, however, if they are used to support projects that fail to bring the hoped-for investment or harm the community in other ways. Enrich special interests at the public\u2019s expense. Poorly designed TIF programs can give government officials a tool to lavish subsidies on favored or well-connected developers \u2013 regardless of the project\u2019s public benefits. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Encourage development in areas where it is least needed. TIF is intended to spur redevelopment of areas in difficult economic straits; but the tool has also been used to fuel development of previously undeveloped areas. Fort Worth, Texas, for example, used TIF financing to lure the big box sporting goods chain Cabela\u2019s to a tract of prime, newly developed land that was declared \u201cblighted\u201d due to the presence of a stream and lake on the property. The process of awarding tax-increment financing often takes place without sufficient public awareness and input \u2013 creating the opportunity for favoritism and corruption.\u00a0 \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 TIF often lacks transparency:\u00a0 The public often lacks the tools to evaluate whether a particular TIF project makes sense. In some states, TIF budgets are not published for public review.\u00a0 In addition, not all states require the completion and publication of growth forecasts that would enable the public to evaluate the costs and benefits of TIF subsidies. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 TIF often lacks accountability:\u00a0 TIF is undertaken in the hope of generating specific benefits\u2014increased employment, land value, and tax revenue among them.\u00a0 Many TIF laws do not, however, require follow up reporting that would enable the public to determine if the goals of the project were realized. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 TIF can create \u201cslush funds\u201d that lack public oversight and accountability: In some jurisdictions, TIF revenue can be spent at the discretion of mayors or other public officials. Chicago\u2019s TIF funds have traditionally been disbursed through a separate budget overseen by the mayor, and not even shared in full with the city council. Funds may be allocated to political allies or pet projects \u2013 or may continue to be used for projects inside a TIF district long after the project originally intended to receive the TIF funds was completed. To prevent these problems, states and municipalities should adopt strong rules governing the use of TIF districts and similar development subsidies.\u00a0\u00a0 In short, rules should ensure that TIFs are targeted, transparent, accountable, and democratically governed. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0TIF districts must be targeted and temporary.\u00a0 TIFs should only be used in service of a specific development strategy, and only in cases where evidence shows that they are likely to succeed. TIFs should not become an all-purpose tool for woo developers. They should only be targeted toward areas in special need of development, for projects that are unlikely to occur without public intervention, and with a defined time limit at which point the property\u2019s tax revenue will once again be used for general public purposes. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Subsidy recipients must be held accountable for meeting goals.\u00a0 TIF agreements should include measurable targets for success, and regular performance reviews should measure progress towards those benchmarks. Where possible, municipalities should retain the ability to demand return of some or all of the money used to subsidize private investors in the event that development promises are not fulfilled. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Information on TIF must be transparent.\u00a0 Because TIF has long-term implications for a jurisdiction\u2019s finances and ability to provide public services, the decision to create a TIF district should come with the highest level of transparency and public participation. In addition, jurisdictions should supply detailed, ongoing information about the finances and performance of TIF projects via the Internet, following \u201cTransparency 2.0\u201d standards of budget and spending disclosure. (See page xx.) \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Citizens must have the tools to evaluate the benefits and trade-offs of TIF. Governments should account for the costs of TIF districts as part of a jurisdiction\u2019s overall budget \u2013 enabling the public and decision-makers to evaluate the trade-offs involved in tax-increment financing and the impacts on other public services.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/dev.pirg-test.com\/georgia\/edfund\/resources\/tax-increment-financing\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tax-Increment Financing\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Local and state governments use various tools to encourage\u00a0 development in economically challenged areas. Tax-increment financing (TIF) has been a leading tool used for this purpose. TIF allows cities and towns to borrow against an area\u2019s future tax revenues in order to invest in immediate projects or encourage present development. When used properly, TIF can promote enduring growth and stronger communities.\u00a0 When used improperly, however, TIF can waste taxpayer resources or channel money to politically favored special interests. To protect the public interest, governments should impose strong safeguards that ensure that TIF projects are implemented through a transparent, accountable process with clear and compelling goals. Governments must use care in choosing when to use tax-increment financing. The public can benefit from subsidies that bring lasting economic development to declining or stagnant areas. However, tax-increment financing can be wasted on projects that: Fail to achieve public goals. \u00a0By definition, TIF diverts money from schools, parks, and other important services. TIF projects certainly won\u2019t be justifiable, however, if they are used to support projects that fail to bring the hoped-for investment or harm the community in other ways. Enrich special interests at the public\u2019s expense. Poorly designed TIF programs can give government officials a tool to lavish subsidies on favored or well-connected developers \u2013 regardless of the project\u2019s public benefits. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Encourage development in areas where it is least needed. TIF is intended to spur redevelopment of areas in difficult economic straits; but the tool has also been used to fuel development of previously undeveloped areas. Fort Worth, Texas, for example, used TIF financing to lure the big box sporting goods chain Cabela\u2019s to a tract of prime, newly developed land that was declared \u201cblighted\u201d due to the presence of a stream and lake on the property. The process of awarding tax-increment financing often takes place without sufficient public awareness and input \u2013 creating the opportunity for favoritism and corruption.\u00a0 \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 TIF often lacks transparency:\u00a0 The public often lacks the tools to evaluate whether a particular TIF project makes sense. In some states, TIF budgets are not published for public review.\u00a0 In addition, not all states require the completion and publication of growth forecasts that would enable the public to evaluate the costs and benefits of TIF subsidies. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 TIF often lacks accountability:\u00a0 TIF is undertaken in the hope of generating specific benefits\u2014increased employment, land value, and tax revenue among them.\u00a0 Many TIF laws do not, however, require follow up reporting that would enable the public to determine if the goals of the project were realized. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 TIF can create \u201cslush funds\u201d that lack public oversight and accountability: In some jurisdictions, TIF revenue can be spent at the discretion of mayors or other public officials. Chicago\u2019s TIF funds have traditionally been disbursed through a separate budget overseen by the mayor, and not even shared in full with the city council. Funds may be allocated to political allies or pet projects \u2013 or may continue to be used for projects inside a TIF district long after the project originally intended to receive the TIF funds was completed. To prevent these problems, states and municipalities should adopt strong rules governing the use of TIF districts and similar development subsidies.\u00a0\u00a0 In short, rules should ensure that TIFs are targeted, transparent, accountable, and democratically governed. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0TIF districts must be targeted and temporary.\u00a0 TIFs should only be used in service of a specific development strategy, and only in cases where evidence shows that they are likely to succeed. TIFs should not become an all-purpose tool for woo developers. They should only be targeted toward areas in special need of development, for projects that are unlikely to occur without public intervention, and with a defined time limit at which point the property\u2019s tax revenue will once again be used for general public purposes. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Subsidy recipients must be held accountable for meeting goals.\u00a0 TIF agreements should include measurable targets for success, and regular performance reviews should measure progress towards those benchmarks. Where possible, municipalities should retain the ability to demand return of some or all of the money used to subsidize private investors in the event that development promises are not fulfilled. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Information on TIF must be transparent.\u00a0 Because TIF has long-term implications for a jurisdiction\u2019s finances and ability to provide public services, the decision to create a TIF district should come with the highest level of transparency and public participation. In addition, jurisdictions should supply detailed, ongoing information about the finances and performance of TIF projects via the Internet, following \u201cTransparency 2.0\u201d standards of budget and spending disclosure. (See page xx.) \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Citizens must have the tools to evaluate the benefits and trade-offs of TIF. Governments should account for the costs of TIF districts as part of a jurisdiction\u2019s overall budget \u2013 enabling the public and decision-makers to evaluate the trade-offs involved in tax-increment financing and the impacts on other public services.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/dev.pirg-test.com\/georgia\/edfund\/resources\/tax-increment-financing\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Georgia PIRG Education Fund\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-08-16T17:54:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\n\t \"@context\": \"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\n\t \"@graph\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/dev.pirg-test.com\\\/georgia\\\/edfund\\\/resources\\\/tax-increment-financing\\\/\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/dev.pirg-test.com\\\/georgia\\\/edfund\\\/resources\\\/tax-increment-financing\\\/\",\n\t \"name\": \"Tax-Increment Financing\",\n\t \"isPartOf\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/dev.pirg-test.com\\\/georgia\\\/edfund\\\/#website\"\n\t },\n\t \"datePublished\": \"2011-10-12T08:00:00+00:00\",\n\t \"dateModified\": \"2022-08-16T17:54:38+00:00\",\n\t \"description\": \"Local and state governments use various tools to encourage\u00a0 development in economically challenged areas. Tax-increment financing (TIF) has been a leading tool used for this purpose. TIF allows cities and towns to borrow against an area\u2019s future tax revenues in order to invest in immediate projects or encourage present development. When used properly, TIF can promote enduring growth and stronger communities.\u00a0 When used improperly, however, TIF can waste taxpayer resources or channel money to politically favored special interests. To protect the public interest, governments should impose strong safeguards that ensure that TIF projects are implemented through a transparent, accountable process with clear and compelling goals. Governments must use care in choosing when to use tax-increment financing. The public can benefit from subsidies that bring lasting economic development to declining or stagnant areas. However, tax-increment financing can be wasted on projects that: Fail to achieve public goals. \u00a0By definition, TIF diverts money from schools, parks, and other important services. TIF projects certainly won\u2019t be justifiable, however, if they are used to support projects that fail to bring the hoped-for investment or harm the community in other ways. Enrich special interests at the public\u2019s expense. Poorly designed TIF programs can give government officials a tool to lavish subsidies on favored or well-connected developers \u2013 regardless of the project\u2019s public benefits. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Encourage development in areas where it is least needed. TIF is intended to spur redevelopment of areas in difficult economic straits; but the tool has also been used to fuel development of previously undeveloped areas. Fort Worth, Texas, for example, used TIF financing to lure the big box sporting goods chain Cabela\u2019s to a tract of prime, newly developed land that was declared \u201cblighted\u201d due to the presence of a stream and lake on the property. The process of awarding tax-increment financing often takes place without sufficient public awareness and input \u2013 creating the opportunity for favoritism and corruption.\u00a0 \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 TIF often lacks transparency:\u00a0 The public often lacks the tools to evaluate whether a particular TIF project makes sense. In some states, TIF budgets are not published for public review.\u00a0 In addition, not all states require the completion and publication of growth forecasts that would enable the public to evaluate the costs and benefits of TIF subsidies. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 TIF often lacks accountability:\u00a0 TIF is undertaken in the hope of generating specific benefits\u2014increased employment, land value, and tax revenue among them.\u00a0 Many TIF laws do not, however, require follow up reporting that would enable the public to determine if the goals of the project were realized. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 TIF can create \u201cslush funds\u201d that lack public oversight and accountability: In some jurisdictions, TIF revenue can be spent at the discretion of mayors or other public officials. Chicago\u2019s TIF funds have traditionally been disbursed through a separate budget overseen by the mayor, and not even shared in full with the city council. Funds may be allocated to political allies or pet projects \u2013 or may continue to be used for projects inside a TIF district long after the project originally intended to receive the TIF funds was completed. To prevent these problems, states and municipalities should adopt strong rules governing the use of TIF districts and similar development subsidies.\u00a0\u00a0 In short, rules should ensure that TIFs are targeted, transparent, accountable, and democratically governed. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0TIF districts must be targeted and temporary.\u00a0 TIFs should only be used in service of a specific development strategy, and only in cases where evidence shows that they are likely to succeed. TIFs should not become an all-purpose tool for woo developers. They should only be targeted toward areas in special need of development, for projects that are unlikely to occur without public intervention, and with a defined time limit at which point the property\u2019s tax revenue will once again be used for general public purposes. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Subsidy recipients must be held accountable for meeting goals.\u00a0 TIF agreements should include measurable targets for success, and regular performance reviews should measure progress towards those benchmarks. Where possible, municipalities should retain the ability to demand return of some or all of the money used to subsidize private investors in the event that development promises are not fulfilled. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Information on TIF must be transparent.\u00a0 Because TIF has long-term implications for a jurisdiction\u2019s finances and ability to provide public services, the decision to create a TIF district should come with the highest level of transparency and public participation. In addition, jurisdictions should supply detailed, ongoing information about the finances and performance of TIF projects via the Internet, following \u201cTransparency 2.0\u201d standards of budget and spending disclosure. (See page xx.) \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Citizens must have the tools to evaluate the benefits and trade-offs of TIF. Governments should account for the costs of TIF districts as part of a jurisdiction\u2019s overall budget \u2013 enabling the public and decision-makers to evaluate the trade-offs involved in tax-increment financing and the impacts on other public services.\",\n\t \"breadcrumb\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/dev.pirg-test.com\\\/georgia\\\/edfund\\\/resources\\\/tax-increment-financing\\\/#breadcrumb\"\n\t },\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"potentialAction\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ReadAction\",\n\t \"target\": [\n\t \"https:\\\/\\\/dev.pirg-test.com\\\/georgia\\\/edfund\\\/resources\\\/tax-increment-financing\\\/\"\n\t ]\n\t }\n\t ],\n\t \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/dev.tpin-test.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/03\\\/WEB_PIRG_Default-Image.jpg\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"BreadcrumbList\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/dev.pirg-test.com\\\/georgia\\\/edfund\\\/resources\\\/tax-increment-financing\\\/#breadcrumb\",\n\t \"itemListElement\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t \"position\": 1,\n\t \"name\": \"Home\",\n\t \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/dev.pirg-test.com\\\/georgia\\\/edfund\\\/\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t \"position\": 2,\n\t \"name\": \"Tax-Increment Financing\"\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"WebSite\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/dev.pirg-test.com\\\/georgia\\\/edfund\\\/#website\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/dev.pirg-test.com\\\/georgia\\\/edfund\\\/\",\n\t \"name\": \"Georgia PIRG Education Fund\",\n\t \"description\": \"\",\n\t \"potentialAction\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"SearchAction\",\n\t \"target\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"EntryPoint\",\n\t \"urlTemplate\": \"https:\\\/\\\/dev.pirg-test.com\\\/georgia\\\/edfund\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"\n\t },\n\t \"query-input\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"PropertyValueSpecification\",\n\t \"valueRequired\": true,\n\t \"valueName\": \"search_term_string\"\n\t }\n\t }\n\t ],\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\"\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tax-Increment Financing","description":"Local and state governments use various tools to encourage\u00a0 development in economically challenged areas. Tax-increment financing (TIF) has been a leading tool used for this purpose. TIF allows cities and towns to borrow against an area\u2019s future tax revenues in order to invest in immediate projects or encourage present development. When used properly, TIF can promote enduring growth and stronger communities.\u00a0 When used improperly, however, TIF can waste taxpayer resources or channel money to politically favored special interests. To protect the public interest, governments should impose strong safeguards that ensure that TIF projects are implemented through a transparent, accountable process with clear and compelling goals. Governments must use care in choosing when to use tax-increment financing. The public can benefit from subsidies that bring lasting economic development to declining or stagnant areas. However, tax-increment financing can be wasted on projects that: Fail to achieve public goals. \u00a0By definition, TIF diverts money from schools, parks, and other important services. TIF projects certainly won\u2019t be justifiable, however, if they are used to support projects that fail to bring the hoped-for investment or harm the community in other ways. Enrich special interests at the public\u2019s expense. Poorly designed TIF programs can give government officials a tool to lavish subsidies on favored or well-connected developers \u2013 regardless of the project\u2019s public benefits. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Encourage development in areas where it is least needed. TIF is intended to spur redevelopment of areas in difficult economic straits; but the tool has also been used to fuel development of previously undeveloped areas. Fort Worth, Texas, for example, used TIF financing to lure the big box sporting goods chain Cabela\u2019s to a tract of prime, newly developed land that was declared \u201cblighted\u201d due to the presence of a stream and lake on the property. The process of awarding tax-increment financing often takes place without sufficient public awareness and input \u2013 creating the opportunity for favoritism and corruption.\u00a0 \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 TIF often lacks transparency:\u00a0 The public often lacks the tools to evaluate whether a particular TIF project makes sense. In some states, TIF budgets are not published for public review.\u00a0 In addition, not all states require the completion and publication of growth forecasts that would enable the public to evaluate the costs and benefits of TIF subsidies. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 TIF often lacks accountability:\u00a0 TIF is undertaken in the hope of generating specific benefits\u2014increased employment, land value, and tax revenue among them.\u00a0 Many TIF laws do not, however, require follow up reporting that would enable the public to determine if the goals of the project were realized. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 TIF can create \u201cslush funds\u201d that lack public oversight and accountability: In some jurisdictions, TIF revenue can be spent at the discretion of mayors or other public officials. Chicago\u2019s TIF funds have traditionally been disbursed through a separate budget overseen by the mayor, and not even shared in full with the city council. Funds may be allocated to political allies or pet projects \u2013 or may continue to be used for projects inside a TIF district long after the project originally intended to receive the TIF funds was completed. To prevent these problems, states and municipalities should adopt strong rules governing the use of TIF districts and similar development subsidies.\u00a0\u00a0 In short, rules should ensure that TIFs are targeted, transparent, accountable, and democratically governed. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0TIF districts must be targeted and temporary.\u00a0 TIFs should only be used in service of a specific development strategy, and only in cases where evidence shows that they are likely to succeed. TIFs should not become an all-purpose tool for woo developers. They should only be targeted toward areas in special need of development, for projects that are unlikely to occur without public intervention, and with a defined time limit at which point the property\u2019s tax revenue will once again be used for general public purposes. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Subsidy recipients must be held accountable for meeting goals.\u00a0 TIF agreements should include measurable targets for success, and regular performance reviews should measure progress towards those benchmarks. Where possible, municipalities should retain the ability to demand return of some or all of the money used to subsidize private investors in the event that development promises are not fulfilled. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Information on TIF must be transparent.\u00a0 Because TIF has long-term implications for a jurisdiction\u2019s finances and ability to provide public services, the decision to create a TIF district should come with the highest level of transparency and public participation. In addition, jurisdictions should supply detailed, ongoing information about the finances and performance of TIF projects via the Internet, following \u201cTransparency 2.0\u201d standards of budget and spending disclosure. (See page xx.) \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Citizens must have the tools to evaluate the benefits and trade-offs of TIF. Governments should account for the costs of TIF districts as part of a jurisdiction\u2019s overall budget \u2013 enabling the public and decision-makers to evaluate the trade-offs involved in tax-increment financing and the impacts on other public services.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/dev.pirg-test.com\/georgia\/edfund\/resources\/tax-increment-financing\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tax-Increment Financing","og_description":"Local and state governments use various tools to encourage\u00a0 development in economically challenged areas. Tax-increment financing (TIF) has been a leading tool used for this purpose. TIF allows cities and towns to borrow against an area\u2019s future tax revenues in order to invest in immediate projects or encourage present development. When used properly, TIF can promote enduring growth and stronger communities.\u00a0 When used improperly, however, TIF can waste taxpayer resources or channel money to politically favored special interests. To protect the public interest, governments should impose strong safeguards that ensure that TIF projects are implemented through a transparent, accountable process with clear and compelling goals. Governments must use care in choosing when to use tax-increment financing. The public can benefit from subsidies that bring lasting economic development to declining or stagnant areas. However, tax-increment financing can be wasted on projects that: Fail to achieve public goals. \u00a0By definition, TIF diverts money from schools, parks, and other important services. TIF projects certainly won\u2019t be justifiable, however, if they are used to support projects that fail to bring the hoped-for investment or harm the community in other ways. Enrich special interests at the public\u2019s expense. Poorly designed TIF programs can give government officials a tool to lavish subsidies on favored or well-connected developers \u2013 regardless of the project\u2019s public benefits. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Encourage development in areas where it is least needed. TIF is intended to spur redevelopment of areas in difficult economic straits; but the tool has also been used to fuel development of previously undeveloped areas. Fort Worth, Texas, for example, used TIF financing to lure the big box sporting goods chain Cabela\u2019s to a tract of prime, newly developed land that was declared \u201cblighted\u201d due to the presence of a stream and lake on the property. The process of awarding tax-increment financing often takes place without sufficient public awareness and input \u2013 creating the opportunity for favoritism and corruption.\u00a0 \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 TIF often lacks transparency:\u00a0 The public often lacks the tools to evaluate whether a particular TIF project makes sense. In some states, TIF budgets are not published for public review.\u00a0 In addition, not all states require the completion and publication of growth forecasts that would enable the public to evaluate the costs and benefits of TIF subsidies. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 TIF often lacks accountability:\u00a0 TIF is undertaken in the hope of generating specific benefits\u2014increased employment, land value, and tax revenue among them.\u00a0 Many TIF laws do not, however, require follow up reporting that would enable the public to determine if the goals of the project were realized. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 TIF can create \u201cslush funds\u201d that lack public oversight and accountability: In some jurisdictions, TIF revenue can be spent at the discretion of mayors or other public officials. Chicago\u2019s TIF funds have traditionally been disbursed through a separate budget overseen by the mayor, and not even shared in full with the city council. Funds may be allocated to political allies or pet projects \u2013 or may continue to be used for projects inside a TIF district long after the project originally intended to receive the TIF funds was completed. To prevent these problems, states and municipalities should adopt strong rules governing the use of TIF districts and similar development subsidies.\u00a0\u00a0 In short, rules should ensure that TIFs are targeted, transparent, accountable, and democratically governed. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0TIF districts must be targeted and temporary.\u00a0 TIFs should only be used in service of a specific development strategy, and only in cases where evidence shows that they are likely to succeed. TIFs should not become an all-purpose tool for woo developers. They should only be targeted toward areas in special need of development, for projects that are unlikely to occur without public intervention, and with a defined time limit at which point the property\u2019s tax revenue will once again be used for general public purposes. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Subsidy recipients must be held accountable for meeting goals.\u00a0 TIF agreements should include measurable targets for success, and regular performance reviews should measure progress towards those benchmarks. Where possible, municipalities should retain the ability to demand return of some or all of the money used to subsidize private investors in the event that development promises are not fulfilled. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Information on TIF must be transparent.\u00a0 Because TIF has long-term implications for a jurisdiction\u2019s finances and ability to provide public services, the decision to create a TIF district should come with the highest level of transparency and public participation. In addition, jurisdictions should supply detailed, ongoing information about the finances and performance of TIF projects via the Internet, following \u201cTransparency 2.0\u201d standards of budget and spending disclosure. (See page xx.) \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Citizens must have the tools to evaluate the benefits and trade-offs of TIF. Governments should account for the costs of TIF districts as part of a jurisdiction\u2019s overall budget \u2013 enabling the public and decision-makers to evaluate the trade-offs involved in tax-increment financing and the impacts on other public services.","og_url":"https:\/\/dev.pirg-test.com\/georgia\/edfund\/resources\/tax-increment-financing\/","og_site_name":"Georgia PIRG Education Fund","article_modified_time":"2022-08-16T17:54:38+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/dev.pirg-test.com\/georgia\/edfund\/resources\/tax-increment-financing\/","url":"https:\/\/dev.pirg-test.com\/georgia\/edfund\/resources\/tax-increment-financing\/","name":"Tax-Increment Financing","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/dev.pirg-test.com\/georgia\/edfund\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-10-12T08:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2022-08-16T17:54:38+00:00","description":"Local and state governments use various tools to encourage\u00a0 development in economically challenged areas. Tax-increment financing (TIF) has been a leading tool used for this purpose. TIF allows cities and towns to borrow against an area\u2019s future tax revenues in order to invest in immediate projects or encourage present development. When used properly, TIF can promote enduring growth and stronger communities.\u00a0 When used improperly, however, TIF can waste taxpayer resources or channel money to politically favored special interests. To protect the public interest, governments should impose strong safeguards that ensure that TIF projects are implemented through a transparent, accountable process with clear and compelling goals. Governments must use care in choosing when to use tax-increment financing. The public can benefit from subsidies that bring lasting economic development to declining or stagnant areas. However, tax-increment financing can be wasted on projects that: Fail to achieve public goals. \u00a0By definition, TIF diverts money from schools, parks, and other important services. TIF projects certainly won\u2019t be justifiable, however, if they are used to support projects that fail to bring the hoped-for investment or harm the community in other ways. Enrich special interests at the public\u2019s expense. Poorly designed TIF programs can give government officials a tool to lavish subsidies on favored or well-connected developers \u2013 regardless of the project\u2019s public benefits. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Encourage development in areas where it is least needed. TIF is intended to spur redevelopment of areas in difficult economic straits; but the tool has also been used to fuel development of previously undeveloped areas. Fort Worth, Texas, for example, used TIF financing to lure the big box sporting goods chain Cabela\u2019s to a tract of prime, newly developed land that was declared \u201cblighted\u201d due to the presence of a stream and lake on the property. The process of awarding tax-increment financing often takes place without sufficient public awareness and input \u2013 creating the opportunity for favoritism and corruption.\u00a0 \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 TIF often lacks transparency:\u00a0 The public often lacks the tools to evaluate whether a particular TIF project makes sense. In some states, TIF budgets are not published for public review.\u00a0 In addition, not all states require the completion and publication of growth forecasts that would enable the public to evaluate the costs and benefits of TIF subsidies. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 TIF often lacks accountability:\u00a0 TIF is undertaken in the hope of generating specific benefits\u2014increased employment, land value, and tax revenue among them.\u00a0 Many TIF laws do not, however, require follow up reporting that would enable the public to determine if the goals of the project were realized. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 TIF can create \u201cslush funds\u201d that lack public oversight and accountability: In some jurisdictions, TIF revenue can be spent at the discretion of mayors or other public officials. Chicago\u2019s TIF funds have traditionally been disbursed through a separate budget overseen by the mayor, and not even shared in full with the city council. Funds may be allocated to political allies or pet projects \u2013 or may continue to be used for projects inside a TIF district long after the project originally intended to receive the TIF funds was completed. To prevent these problems, states and municipalities should adopt strong rules governing the use of TIF districts and similar development subsidies.\u00a0\u00a0 In short, rules should ensure that TIFs are targeted, transparent, accountable, and democratically governed. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0TIF districts must be targeted and temporary.\u00a0 TIFs should only be used in service of a specific development strategy, and only in cases where evidence shows that they are likely to succeed. TIFs should not become an all-purpose tool for woo developers. They should only be targeted toward areas in special need of development, for projects that are unlikely to occur without public intervention, and with a defined time limit at which point the property\u2019s tax revenue will once again be used for general public purposes. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Subsidy recipients must be held accountable for meeting goals.\u00a0 TIF agreements should include measurable targets for success, and regular performance reviews should measure progress towards those benchmarks. Where possible, municipalities should retain the ability to demand return of some or all of the money used to subsidize private investors in the event that development promises are not fulfilled. \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Information on TIF must be transparent.\u00a0 Because TIF has long-term implications for a jurisdiction\u2019s finances and ability to provide public services, the decision to create a TIF district should come with the highest level of transparency and public participation. In addition, jurisdictions should supply detailed, ongoing information about the finances and performance of TIF projects via the Internet, following \u201cTransparency 2.0\u201d standards of budget and spending disclosure. (See page xx.) \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Citizens must have the tools to evaluate the benefits and trade-offs of TIF. Governments should account for the costs of TIF districts as part of a jurisdiction\u2019s overall budget \u2013 enabling the public and decision-makers to evaluate the trade-offs involved in tax-increment financing and the impacts on other public services.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/dev.pirg-test.com\/georgia\/edfund\/resources\/tax-increment-financing\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/dev.pirg-test.com\/georgia\/edfund\/resources\/tax-increment-financing\/"]}],"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/dev.tpin-test.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/WEB_PIRG_Default-Image.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/dev.pirg-test.com\/georgia\/edfund\/resources\/tax-increment-financing\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/dev.pirg-test.com\/georgia\/edfund\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tax-Increment Financing"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/dev.pirg-test.com\/georgia\/edfund\/#website","url":"https:\/\/dev.pirg-test.com\/georgia\/edfund\/","name":"Georgia PIRG Education Fund","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/dev.pirg-test.com\/georgia\/edfund\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"Georgia PIRG Education Fund","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/dev.pirg-test.com\/georgia\/edfund","push-errors":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.pirg-test.com\/georgia\/edfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource\/673","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.pirg-test.com\/georgia\/edfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.pirg-test.com\/georgia\/edfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/resource"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dev.pirg-test.com\/georgia\/edfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource\/673\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.pirg-test.com\/georgia\/edfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=673"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"campaign_tax","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.pirg-test.com\/georgia\/edfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/campaign_tax?post=673"},{"taxonomy":"display_option","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.pirg-test.com\/georgia\/edfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/display_option?post=673"},{"taxonomy":"issue_tax","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.pirg-test.com\/georgia\/edfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issue_tax?post=673"},{"taxonomy":"resource_type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.pirg-test.com\/georgia\/edfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource_type?post=673"},{"taxonomy":"region_tax","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.pirg-test.com\/georgia\/edfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/region_tax?post=673"},{"taxonomy":"state","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.pirg-test.com\/georgia\/edfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/state?post=673"},{"taxonomy":"topic_tax","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.pirg-test.com\/georgia\/edfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic_tax?post=673"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}